It has long been claimed that it is the opposing thumb which separates a species for the distinction of superiority and I would note that, as with all monkeys, I have 4 of them [plus a prehensile tail] whereas humans have only 2, thus by the standard set by humans I can be logically proven to be superior to all humans. Setting that aside, your comment on brain size is in fact misleading since men of small stature do not have lower IQs in general to those of gigantic proportions even though the actual size of their brain is smaller it must be concluded that it is proportionate size rather than literal size which counts and in that, us monkeys have you beat. This then concludes my dissertation on why I am superior to you. This dissertation has been reviewed and found factual and accurate by a team of 100 monkeys, the accuracy of their assessment is 95% plus or minus 1% 93% of the time. Thank you.
Interpreters are available to dumb down this explanation for those suffering from a lack of simian mental superiority.
Oh, and TT wears a clown nose whenever he goes out in public
Science is what machines perceive
Reality is what humans perceive